The new interview

Celebrity bloggers are finding themselves in the absurd position of being interviewed by journalists working in print media. It’s gratifying to watch the big dogs go at it from a distance after being in a similarly prickly debate with Steve Fox while he was serving as my editor during two weeks of volunteer work a month ago.

Fox actually had time for only one conversation with me, during which he mentioned twice that he hadn’t found time to read the dozen or more email messages from the writers contributing to the topic he’d assigned us. It’s true he was overwhelmed by a flood of volunteers. That happens when you assume the role of a gatekeeper.

Left to my own devices, I had formed an outsider’s opinion of the objectives of citizen journalism, open source journalism, or pro-am journalism—some of the terms used to describe the experimental journalism project in which I briefly participated. These three phrases in particular have since acquired different shades of meaning for many of us.

Tantalized by the possibility of engaging my interview subjects in an open online dialog, I contacted several law enforcement agencies, spoke to some progressive agency heads, and offered to facilitate blogging. At the time I spoke to Fox, I had not yet located the intrepid subject who would be the first to accept the challenge of participating in collaborative journalism on the Web.

Fox’s amused reaction to my approach came as a surprise. What I proposed to do was not journalism, he insisted. Instead, he strongly advocated a traditional, structured Q&A format followed by thoughtful reportorial analysis. He was, however, willing to publish audio recordings of interviews conducted by volunteer reporters. Fox was emphatic. “We’re interviewing major players,” he told me, “but we’re not telling Jeff Jarvis to just log on and tell his story.”

It wasn’t until weeks later that I realized Jeff Jarvis referred to Jay Rosen as his friend. (Rosen was Fox’s executive editor until a week after my phone conversation with Fox.) A talented project contributor interviewed Jarvis via email, and then Jarvis immediately posted the text of the interview on his blog, which certainly made me smile. Jarvis was owning his story. I think that’s fair, and it’s exactly what you’d expect from a blogger. Today, he asserts the traditional interview is outmoded.

Law enforcement officials are justifiably wary of dealing with the traditional news media, because their statements have been interpreted out of context in the past. Now, agencies like the Broward Sheriff’s Office publish their press releases through their own websites in an obvious effort to avoid being misquoted or accused of favoring a particular news outlet. CEOs are being exhorted to get transparent by blogging or vlogging. Some (but not all) of us really do want certain information straight from the source rather than after it’s been digested by an intermediary. We’re willing to try to discern who’s being honest. Sometimes it’s simply easier to analyze information that hasn’t been filtered.

2 Replies to “The new interview”

  1. You know, Robin, I just looked at the title of your blog for the first time, and I realized you’re so far ahead of the curve that in an ironic twist of fate, your brilliance in coming up with the “Treated and Released–97% Transparent” title just might cause the front tip of the curve to whip around and bite you in the ass just because it thinks it can.

    When we partnered up on that AZ thing, you were so nice you thought everyone had been treated and released. HA! Some, no names mentioned, apparently needed their medication just to do their meditation, and mediation was clearly out of the question, so really, the only thing transparent about that experiment, ovah there, was how wickedly in need of interpersonal conversation and communication skills, of both the social and the linguistic type, certain people are…er, were. ::snort::

    I think this blog is where the truth about transparency reveals itself. I’m yet to be convinced it’s (transparency) what they say it is, but I do agree it’s powerful. On the other hand, so is anarchy, properly executed, of course. Bravo, Robin! ttt

  2. Ms. Mizell,

    I say you are fighting the good fight! Control over information is power used to create unfair hierarchies, and so you are helping people to re-assert power over their own destinies.

    In other words: thanks!

    Dan Kearns

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s